Han Lin in Financial Times: ‘The IMF’s mandate, governance incentives and China’s weight all push the institution towards calibrated, consensus driven language rather than headline grabbing confrontation’
Han Lin, China country director of the Asia Group, a US consultancy, said he expected Katz to press “quietly and ...
Media
Commentary
China’s Calculus on the Middle East Crisis
China’s initial posture following Hamas’ surprise terrorist attack in Israel on October 7 reflected a familiar strategy of minimizing risk by avoiding involvement and any sharp public statements. Notably, China has not specifically condemned Hamas’ October 7 actions, but has condemned condemned violence against civilians and called for restraint by “all parties.”
In response to Israeli complaints, Foreign Minister Wang Yi acknowledged that all countries have a “right to self-defense” during his October 23 phone call with his Israeli counterpart. On the same day, however, Wang told his Palestinian counterpart that China “deeply sympathizes with the difficult situation of the Palestinian side, especially the people of Gaza.”
China has a clear interest in avoiding a wider, regional conflict that could disrupt global commerce, particularly access to energy. A wider conflict may push Beijing toward heightened engagement, despite historical reluctance. As world attention focuses on an Israeli ground invasion of Gaza – with a likely rise in global public criticism of Israel – The Asia Group will be closely watching if Beijing opts for more activist rhetoric and actions to erode U.S. standing on the international stage and in key regions of competition, such as Southeast Asia and the wider Global South.
Listen on:
Related Posts
Rintaro Nishimura sits down with Nikkei Asia to recap Japan’s year in politics
Han Lin on IMF’s mild criticism of weak Chinese currency in New York Times
Kurt Campbell featured on At Home with the Financial Times
Han Lin in Financial Times: ‘The IMF’s mandate, governance incentives and China’s weight all push the institution towards calibrated, consensus driven language rather than headline grabbing confrontation’