Front Row with Han Lin: For U.S. MNCs, here is the formula for China
It’s been a turbulent year for global business. From Washington’s “Liberation Day” tariffs to Beijing’s retaliations, multinationals have been pulled into the center of the world’s most politically charged trade relationship. Two-thirds of American Chamber of Commerce (AmCham) members now cite U.S.–China tensions as their top operational challenge, far ahead of concerns about China’s economic slowdown.
If not for geopolitics, investing in China might still be an easy sell. The country scores high on nearly every attribute that global executives care about – political stability, a massive market, pro-growth industrial policies, improved profit repatriation, world-class supply chains, low financing costs, and a highly educated workforce.
Dual Pressure Cooker
Yet friction between Washington and Beijing now overshadows it all, turning what should be a clean “does a project’s return-on-capital exceed cost-of-capital?” question into a daily stress test in geopolitics.
“What doesn’t kill you only makes you stronger,” the saying goes. Washington’s trade policies push multinationals to “de-risk.” China’s hyper-competitive market forces them to adapt. The tension captures what’s often lost in translation: For most U.S. multinationals, China remains an unpredictable but still appealing market, and increasingly critical to corporate resilience-building.
How U.S. Firms Are Adapting
Despite the pressures, U.S. companies in China are neither capitulating nor retreating. Instead, they are rewriting the playbook to reshape operations and remain viable in a stratified world. Strategies include:
1. Localization 2.0: “In China, for China and non-U.S. markets.”
According to the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai’s 2025 China Business Review, nearly one-third of Chamber members now identify “China for China” as their main strategy, and another 15 percent say they are “in China for China and non-U.S. markets.” Tesla’s Shanghai Gigafactory is a classic model that produces for domestic China market yet exports, increasingly to non-U.S. markets.
2. Supply Chain Redundancy.
More than half of U.S. firms are investing in supply-chain resilience, splitting production lines to serve U.S. and non-U.S. markets separately —China-based R&D for Asia, and Mexico or Eastern Europe for the West. This redundancy lowers political exposure while preserving scale efficiency.
3. Digital Adaptation and AI Partnerships.
As Chinese firms surge ahead in generative AI, some foreign companies are co-innovating rather than competing head-on. Uniquely, SAP and Alibaba have collaborated on providing AI-powered enterprise solutions to China and global market clients. These collaborations turn data security regulatory constraints into market learning.
4. Corporate Diplomacy.
Perhaps the least visible but most consequential adaptation is boardroom diplomacy. Nearly 80 percent of U.S. executives identify improved U.S.-China bilateral relations as the single biggest potential boost to their industry. This isn’t restricted to government-to-government. Firms increasingly engage with local officials and trade associations directly, maintaining people-to-people commercial dialogue even when U.S.-China politics stall.
In 2025 interviews with Shanghai officials, they often share their hope to hear from U.S. executives any of what could colloquially be termed the “5 C’s and 2 I’s.”
The New Formula
The 5 Cs include Committing to China, Collaborating with local partners, demonstrating good Corporate citizenship, driving Consumption, and improving Collection of taxes, while the 2 Is include Investing in China and fostering Innovation. These now constitute the informal benchmarks of credibility for U.S. businesses.
When visiting U.S. executives articulate these themes sincerely, even if only aspirational, they are seen as constructive stakeholders rather than transient traders. This soft diplomacy has become a quiet but vital form of political risk mitigation.
Era of Recoding
What these strategies reveal is a reality more complex than “de-risking.” U.S. firms in China are recoding their operations for a world where politics and economics are intertwined. U.S. executives now think in parallel scenarios – one supply chain for Washington’s world, another for Beijing’s: one data stack for China’s internet, another for global systems.
This separation is costly but has triggered innovations governance, compliance, and local engagement. It also underscores that, despite political fatigue, U.S.-China economic interdependence remains deep and still holds potential for renewal.
In the end, the story of U.S. multinationals in China is less about exit than endurance. The executives running these operations are pragmatic realists. They know they can’t wish away tariffs, tech or critical mineral restrictions, but they also know that a middle class of 400 million, world-class process innovation, and an increasingly sophisticated regulatory state are not going anywhere. That, too, is something often lost in translation.
Han Lin is the China managing director at The Asia Group. He is based in Shanghai. Reporting for this article included analysis of the 2025 AmCham Shanghai China Business Report, review of corporate disclosures and trade publications, and interviews the author conducted in Shanghai and Beijing (May–Sept 2025) with senior executives, and local officials. The “5 C’s and 2 I’s” framework is the author’s synthesis of those conversations.
Front Row offers the expertise and insights of TAG’s partners, senior advisors, and senior staff across policy themes, markets, and sectors.