Commentary

Spotlight: Industry Risks and Responses to China’s Export Controls on Critical Minerals and Rare Earths

Key Takeaways

  • Critical Minerals Have Become the Flashpoint to Watch in the U.S.-China Trade War: The latest round of U.S.-China negotiations in London has renewed focus on the fragility of global mineral supply chains and the strategic risks posed by China’s dominance in processing. Even with signs of de-escalation, the talks highlight how critical mineral dependencies remain a structural vulnerability for the United States. In April 2025, Beijing issued Announcement 18, a direct response to U.S. tariffs that introduced tight controls on exports of seven rare earths and minerals critical to the production of advanced defense equipment and clean technologies. Although last month’s U.S.-China trade talks in Geneva paused further escalation, signs are pointing toward some easing on U.S. buyers following last week’s Trump-Xi call. However, critical mineral curbs remain Beijing’s key point of negotiation leverage.
  • China’s Controls are Constricting Global Supply Chains: Beijing’s new restrictions on the export of critical minerals and rare earths – imposed in retaliation for U.S. tariffs – are creating major disruptions across multiple sectors, including technology, telecommunications, energy, and defense. First introduced in 2023 and accelerated in early 2025, the regulations include licensing requirements, volume caps, and other restrictions that limit international availability – resulting in price volatility, production slowdowns, and financial strain for downstream manufacturers.
  • Resource Nationalism Compounds Supply Chain Uncertainty: Even prior to the current trade war, Beijing began restricting raw mineral exports to boost domestic manufacturing and support China’s value-added industries. China’s dominant position in mineral refining, combined with its additional restrictions on rare earth elements and tungsten, has accelerated the global move toward tighter controls. Other mineral-rich countries have now adopted similar strategies, indicating an increasingly protectionist, structural realignment in critical mineral supply chains that is likely to persist regardless of any future U.S.-China détente.
  • Companies Must Strengthen Operational Resilience: The current environment leaves multinational firms with little room for delay. To avoid disruption from China’s export controls, multinational companies face a critical window for diversifying their sourcing, exploring material substitution, strategic stockpiling, and investing in recycling infrastructure.

Related Posts

Jennifer Lee in Financial Times on the ROK investment announcement
Jennifer Lee, a Washington-based partner at The Asia Group, said she expected the first disbursement to be tied to the ...
Han in The Guardian: Foie gras, live dolphins and toasters: China and US cut reciprocal tariffs on $30bn each of goods
Han Lin, the China country director at The Asia Group, a strategic advisory firm, said: “The animal list is certainly ...
Colonel (Ret.) Shailender S. Arya in Mint on India’s surveillance satellite program
Shailender Arya, senior advisor at strategic advisory firm The Asia Group, said that the launch of the EOS-5 satellite by ...
George Chen in CNN International on the growing U.S.-China AI competition
Despite growing calls to prevent AI development from spiraling out of control, the Trump-Xi summit has produced little substance, as ...
Scroll to Top

You Are Applying For:

Spotlight: Industry Risks and Responses to China’s Export Controls on Critical Minerals and Rare Earths

Apply Now